Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 81 Download : 47

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper tries to present the other side of Nurcholish Madjid's interpretation of the term kalimatun sawā` in surah Ali Imran [3] ayah 64. The interpretation of the verse, which has tended to be interpreted uniformly in the tafsir tradition, is interpreted differently by Nurcholish Madjid. In addition, behind his interpretation he proposes an offer of locality orientation in a broader context. The aspect of locality that has been the dominant starting point of the interpretation of the Qur'an, for Nurcholish Madjid is used as a point of departure that is sought to strengthen his interpretation. This research belongs to the qualitative research model. By using a library research approach, the author will explore Nurcholish Madjid's argumentation in interpreting Surah Ali Imran verse 64, especially on the term kalimatun sawā`. As a result, the interpretation of the verse shows a legitimization of the view of locality which in this case is interpreted as Pancasila. The term kalimatun sawā` , which is the key word in this verse, leads to the confirmation of the argumentation built with the results of the interpretation carried out. This view is very reasonable because the spirit of the values and messages of the Qur'an that preach the unity of the people does not limit the partition in a broad social context. Although explicitly Nurcholish Madjid's study of the Qur'an does not produce unity in terms of methodology, the spirit that is built cannot be separated from the values of the Qur'an itself.

Keywords

Indonesian Tafsir Interpretation Kalimatun sawā` Locality Nurcholish Madjid

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fatkhurrohman, A. A. (2024). Nilai Lokalitas Penafsiran Kalimatun sawā` QS Ali Imran Ayat 64 Perspektif Nurcholish Madjid. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 3(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v3i2.192
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amrullah, A. M. K. (2003). Tafsir al-azhar. Singapore: Kerjaya Printing Industries, 2.
  2. Asad, M. (1980). The message of the Qurʾan. Dar al-Andalus. https://ixtheo.de/Record/1152452657
  3. Ath-Thabari, I. J. (n.d.). Tafsir ath-Thabari (5th ed.). Pustaka Azam.
  4. Aziz, A. A. (1999). Neo-Modernisme Islam di Indonesia: Gagasan Sentral Nurcholish Madjid dan Abdurrahman Wahid. Rineka Cipta.
  5. Azyumardi, A. (1999). Menuju Masyarakat Madani: Gagasan, Fakta, dan Tantangan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  6. Cooke, P. (1990). Locality, structure, and agency: a theoretical analysis. Cultural Anthropology, 5(1), 3–15.
  7. Gusmian, I. (2015). Tafsir al-Qur’an di Indonesia: Sejarah dan Dinamika. Nun: Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Tafsir Di Nusantara, 1(1).
  8. Gusmian, I. (2016). Tafsir Al-Quran Bahasa Jawa Peneguhan Identitas, Ideologi, dan Politik Perlawanan. Suhuf, 9(1), 141–168.
  9. Hidayat, K. (2016). Memahami Bahasa Agama: Sebuah Kajian Hermeneutik. Paramadina.
  10. Huda, S., Muhammad, D. H., & Susandi, A. (2022). Konsep Pendidikan Islam Multikultural Dalam Pandangan KH. Abdurrahman Wahid Dan Nurcholish Madjid. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(2), 148–156.
  11. Ibn Katsir. (2003). Tafsir Ibnu Katsir (2nd ed.). Pustaka Imam Syafi’i.
  12. Imam al-Qurthubi. (2007). Tafsir al-Qurthubi (IV). Pustaka Azam.
  13. Imam asy-Syaukani. (n.d.). Tafsir Fathul Qadir (2nd ed.). Pustaka Azam.
  14. Johns, A. (2005). Quranic exegesis in the Malay-Indonesian world: An introductory survey. In Approaches to the Qur’an in Contemporary Indonesia. Oxford University Press.
  15. Madakir, M., Firdaus, S., Hajam, H., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Multicultural Islamic Education of Nurcholis Madjid Perspective: A Literature Review. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(5), 191–201.
  16. Madjid, N. (1992). Islam: Doktrin dan Peradaban. Yayasan Wakaf Paramadina Jakarta.
  17. Majid, N. (1995). Islam agama peradaban: membangun makna dan relevansi doktrin Islam dalam sejarah. Paramadina.
  18. Majid, N. (2008). Islam, kemodernan, dan keindonesiaan. Mizan Pustaka.
  19. Moko, C. W. (2017). Pluralisme agama menurut Nurcholis Madjid (1939-2005) dalam konteks keindonesiaan. Medina-Te, 13(1), 61–78.
  20. MUFLIHUDIN, M. (2018). Pemikiran Politik Nurcholish Madjid Tentang Relasi Islam dan Negara di Indonesia Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah. UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
  21. Munir, M. (2018). Modernisasi Pendidikan Islam dalam Perspektif Nurcholish Madjid. Evaluasi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 202–222.
  22. Mustaqim, A. (2010). Epistemologi tafsir kontemporer.
  23. Naim, N. (2015). Islam dan Pancasila: Rekonstruksi Pemikiran Nurcholish Madjid. Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman, 10(2), 435–456.
  24. Nur‘Afifah, F. (1996). Civil Society: Relevansinya dengan Kenyataan Sosial Umat Islam Indonesia (Studi Pemikiran Tafsir Nurcholish Madjid). The Hitotsubashi Review, 116(3), 497–510.
  25. Pink, J. (2020). The kyai’s voice and the Arabic Qur’an; Translation, orality, and print in modern Java. Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 21(3), 1.
  26. Putra, A., Anwar, H., & Hariyadi, M. (2006). Lokalitas Tafsir Al-Qur’an Minangkabau. Jurnal Studi Alqur’an, 1(3), 521–542.
  27. Rachman, B. M. (2006). Ensiklopedi Nurcholish Madjid: Pemikiran Islam di Kanvas Peradaban.“. Edisi Digital, 4, 3209.
  28. Rachman, B. M. (2010). Argumen Islam untuk liberalisme. Grasindo.
  29. Rahman, M. T., & Mimbar, A. S. (2018). Konsep politik Islam Kultural Perspektif Nurcholish Madjid. FIKRI: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 3(2), 385–400.
  30. Rasyidin, Y. (2020). Menjelajahi Pemikiran Politik Nurcholis Madjid Tentang Agama dan Negara. Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 16(1), 35–44.
  31. Ridwan, N. K. (2002). Pluralisme borjuis: kritik atas nalar pluralisme Cak Nur. Galang Press.
  32. Saleh, W. A. (2010). Preliminary Remarks on the Historiography of tafsīr in Arabic: A History of the Book Approach. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 12(1–2), 6–40.
  33. Shihab, M. Q. (2007). Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian al-Qur’an, cet II. In Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
  34. Sidjabat, W. B. (1982). Religious tolerance and Christian faith: a study concerning the concept of divine omnipotence in the Indonesian Constitution in the light of Islam and Christianity Princeton: Princeton Seminary, 1960.
  35. Sofyan, A. A., & Madjid, R. (2003). Gagasan Cak Nur tentang Negara dan Islam Yogyakarta (p. 72). Titian Ilahi Press.
  36. Supardi, A., Walad, S. Z., Hardianti, M., Sabarudin, I., & Sidiq, H. (2023). Paradigma Bela Negara dalam Surat An-Naml Ayat 1-66: Representasi Akronim Kata “AN-NAML.” Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 2(1), 30–38.
  37. Suryadi, S. (2017). Teologi inklusif Nurcholish Madjid (pemikiran tentang pluralisme dan liberalisme agama). Manthiq, 2(1).
  38. Tasrif, M. (2016). Indonesia Modern Sebagai Konteks Penafsiran: Telaah Metodologi Penafsiran Alquran Nurcholish Madjid (1939-2005). Nun: Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Tafsir Di Nusantara, 2(2).
  39. Ulfa, M. (2013). Mencermati Inklusivisme Agama Nurcholish Madjid. Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 11(2), 238–250.