Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 146 Download : 116

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Verse 200 of Ali Imran's letter, although it does not explicitly mention assessment as Learning (AaL), is interpreted by Al-Ghazali in Ihya Ulumuddin (IU) as a murabathah system that includes six phases. This paper aims to confirm this interpretation with various general theories about the latest AaL challenges, and to build a construction of the interpretation of Al-Ghazali's AaL concept. The method used is library research with a content analysis approach, de-contextualization, and re-contextualization analysis techniques, as well as basic inductive techniques. Research findings state that Al-Ghazali's interpretation of AaL is in line with the latest AaL theory, such as AaL based on SRL (self-regulation of learning), especially based on co-regulation of learning with four main phases: forethought, planning and activation, monitoring, control, reaction, and reflection. Apart from that, it is also in line with formative and summative evaluation theories, as well as theories about feedback. In the area section, AaL Al-Ghazali's interpretation is in line with the areas of cognition, motivation/affect, behavior, and context. This research also succeeded in developing the construction of Al-Ghazali's AaL system which consists of: musyarathah, muraqabah, muhasabah, mu’aqabah, mujahadah and mu’atabah into concrete form.

Keywords

Assessment as Learning Al-Ghazali Ihya Ulumuddin

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Abdurrahman. (2024). Konsep Evaluasi Pembelajaran Menurut Surah Ali Imran Ayat 200 (Studi Pemikiran Al-Ghazali dalam Ihya Ulumuddin). Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 3(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v3i2.196
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdurrahman, & Anggarini, I. F. (2024). Character Educational Management in Ihya Ulumuddin: Al Ghazali’s Perspectives. Proceeding of International Conference on Education, Society And Humanity, 272–282. https://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/icesh/article/view/7767
  2. Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. (1990). Ihya Ulumuddin. Dar Al-Makrifat.
  3. Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
  4. Anwar, K. (2019a). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Menurut Al-Qur’an. Rausyan Fikr : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pencerahan, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.31000/rf.v15i1.1368
  5. Anwar, K. (2019b). Memahami Evaluasi Pembelajaran Menurut Al-Qur’an. Rausyan Fikr : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pencerahan, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.31000/rf.v15i2.1808
  6. At-Thanthawi, M. S. (1998). At-Tafsir Al-Wasith li Al-Qur’an Al-Karim. Dar Nahdlah Misr.
  7. Conrad, D. (2023). The Community of Inquiry and authentic assessment. In The Design of Digital Learning Environments (1st ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003246206
  8. Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & Searsmith, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(12). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732
  9. Dell, D., & Vaughan, N. (2023). Fostering student self- and co-regulation in a community of inquiry: development of a Self-Assessment and Praxis Tool. In The Design of Digital Learning Environments (1st ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003246206
  10. Guo, X. (2024). Cross-cultural assessment of the community of inquiry instrument: a comparison between UK and US students. Accounting Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2024.2303079
  11. Hasanah, N., Badriyah, L., & Selia, W. D. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Ditinjau Dari Al-Qur’an Surah Al-Ankabut Ayat 2-3. JPT (Jurnal Pendidikan Tematik), 1(2). https://www.siducat.org/index.php/jpt/article/view/60
  12. Helvi Kyngäs. (2020). Inductive Content Analysis. In The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6
  13. Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Boud, D. (2021). The quality of assessment tasks as a determinant of learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1828268
  14. Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4
  15. Lentz, A., Siy, J. O., & Carraccio, C. (2021). AI-ssessment: Towards Assessment As a Sociotechnical System for Learning. Academic Medicine, 96(7). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004104
  16. Lindgren, B. M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. In International Journal of Nursing Studies (Vol. 108). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632
  17. Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. In Review of Education (Vol. 9, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292
  18. Schellekens, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., de Jong, L. H., van der Schaaf, M. F., Kremer, W. D. J., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2021). A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). In Studies in Educational Evaluation (Vol. 71). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094
  19. Svensäter, G., & Rohlin, M. (2023). Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy. European Journal of Dental Education, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12787
  20. Yan, Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390