Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (English)
Statistic
Read Counter : 32 Download : 14

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The systematic arrangement of the Qur’an has raised pros and cons among Western academies regarding its coherence. This research examines the structure of Sūrah al-Fajr as a response to orientalist criticism, which argues that the structure of the verses is not connected. By using the theoretical framework of Munāsabah and Semitic Rhetoric, this research aims to confirm the relationship of the verses in Sūrah al-Fajr to show the accuracy of their arrangement, as well as to find the relationship between Munāsabah and Semitic Rhetoric in explaining the structure of the Sūrah. This library research uses a qualitative approach and descriptive-comparative methods in analyzing data. As a result, all the verses in Sūrah al-Fajr have been proven to be well structured and coherent based on Munāsabah and Semitic Rhetoric. Both can emphasize the structure of the Sūrah, although in different ways. Munāsabah emphasizes the linear connection of verses in a Sūrah, while Semitic Rhetoric explains the structure at each level of the text. In this way, Orientalist criticism regarding the composition of the Sūrah can be refuted.

Keywords

The Qur'an Munāsabah Semitic Rhetoric Al-Fajr

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Asnawi, A. R., Manzilah, & Selamat Bin Amir. (2025). A Comparative Study of Munāsabah and Semitic Rhetoric in Sūrah Al-Fajr. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 4(2), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v4i2.339
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abubakar, R. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
  2. al-Rāzī, F. al-Dīn. (1981). Mafātih al-Ghayb (Vol. 31). Dār Ihya’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
  3. al-Zarkashī, B. al-Dīn. (1957). Al-Burhān fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Dār al-Ma’rifah.
  4. Al-Baghawi. (1997). Ma’ālim al-Tanzīl (Vol. 1). Maktabah al-Tijariyah al-Kubra.
  5. al-Biqā’ī, I. ‘Umar. (1990a). Naẓm al-Durar fī Tanāsub al-Āyāt wa al-Suwar (Vol. 1). Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmī.
  6. al-Biqā’ī, I. ‘Umar. (1990b). Naẓm al-Durar fī Tanāsub al-Āyāt wa al-Suwar (Vol. 22). Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmī.
  7. Al-Zarqānī, M. A. ’Aɀim. (1990). Manāhil al-’Irfān fī ’Ulum Al-Qur’ān (Vol. 1). Dār Kitāb al-’Arabī.
  8. Asnawi, A. R. (2018a). Penerapan Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA) Pada Sūrah Al-Qiyamah. Mutawatir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 8. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2018.8.1.143-169.
  9. Asnawi, A. R. (2021). Re-Analyzing the Structure of Sūrah Al-’Alaq Using Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA): A Critical Study on Cuypers’ Methodology of Analyzing Qur’anic Structure. Studi Quranika, 13(1).
  10. Asnawi, A. R. (2022). Koherensi Struktur Al-Qur’an Perspektif Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA) Interpretasi Al-Qur’an Michel Cuypers. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel.
  11. Asnawi, A. R. (2023a). Islamisasi Metode Barat Dalam Studi Al-Qur’an Studi Kasus Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA). Jurnal Reflektika, 18. https://doi.org/10.28944/reflektika.v18i2.1283
  12. Asnawi, A. R. (2023b). Uncovering The Interconnected Text Structure of QS. Al-Mulk: A Semitic Rhetorical Analysis. Ases IV. International Scientific Research Conference, Istanbul.
  13. Asnawi, A. R., & Aisyah, M. H. (2023). Re-Examining the Qur’anic Structure in Qs. Waqi’ah Using Semitic Rhetorical Analysis. International conference on social science.
  14. Asnawi, A. R., & Idri. (2020). Examining Semitic Rhetoric: A Qur’anic Sciences Perspective. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 28. https://doi.org/10.24014/Jush.v28i2.9898
  15. Asnawi, A. R., Suharto, A., Shahir, M. B., Anggara, D. R. A., & Hannah. (2023). The Coherence Of Sūrah Al-Dzariyat In Perspective Of Semitic Rhetoric. Jurnal Ilmiah Al Mu’ashirah, 20 no. 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v20i1.16021
  16. Badriyah, L. (2020). Iram Dalam Al-Qur’an (Studi Penafsiran QS. al-Fajr{89}: 6-8). Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel.
  17. Bell, R. (1939). The Qur’an Translated, with a critical re-arrangement of the Sūrahs (Vol. 2). Edinburgh: T. & T Clark.
  18. Cuypers, M. (2011). Semitic Rhetoric as a Key to the Question of the naẓm of the Qur’anic Text. Journal of Qur‘anic Studies, 3. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2011.0003
  19. Cuypers, M. (2016). fi Nazm Sūrah al-Maidah: Nazm ayi al-Qur’an fi Daw’ manhaj al-Tahlil al-Balaghi. Dar al-Mashriq.
  20. Cuypers, M. (2018). A Quranic Apocalypse: A Reading of the Thirty-Three Last Sūrahs of the Qur’ān (J. Ryan, Trans.). Lockwood Press.
  21. Ḥawwā, S. (1424a). Al-Asās Fī al-Tafsīr (Vol. 11). Dār al-Salām.
  22. Ḥawwā, S. (1424b). Al-Asās Fī al-Tafsīr (Vol. 1). Dār al-Salām.
  23. Huda, A. A. S., Nurhuda, A., Setyaningtyas, N. A., Syafi’i, M. I., & Putra, F. A. (2025). Hermeneutika dalam Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora dan Agama: Model, Pengembangan dan Metode Penelitian. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 4(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v4i1.239
  24. Ibn ‘Āshūr, M. al-Ṭāhir. (1984a). Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr (Vol. 30). al-Dār al-Tūnisīyah li al-Nashr.
  25. Ibn ‘Āshūr, M. al-Țāhir. (1984b). Al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr (Vol. 1). al-Dār al-Tūnisīyah li al-Nashr.
  26. Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  27. Muhammady, A., Bakar, A., Musafa’ah, S., & Asnawi, A. R. (2022). Struktur Sūrah Al-Hijr Perspektif Semetic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA). Jurnal Reflektika, 17.2. https://doi.org/10.28944/reflektika.v17i2.816
  28. Nurmansyah, I., & Oktaviana, S. K. (2023). Urgensi Belajar dan Bersujud dalam QS. al- ‘Alaq Ayat 1 dan 19: Kajian Munāsabah Al-Qur’an. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 2(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v2i1.27
  29. Qaththān, M. (2000). Mabāhith fī ’Ilm Al-Qur’ān. Maktabah Wahbiyyah.
  30. Quthb, S. (2003). Fī Zilāl Al-Qur’ān (Vol. 30). Dār Syurūk.
  31. Rahmadi. (2011). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Antasari Press.
  32. Sanar. (2013). Al-Nafs Muthmainnah Dalam QS. Al-Fajr/89: 27-30 (Suatu Kajian Tafsir Tahlili). Universitas Islam Negeri Alaudin.
  33. Shihab, M. Q. (1997). Mukjizat Al-Qur’an, Ditinjau dari Aspek Kebahasaan, Isyarat Ilmiah, Pemberitaan Ghaib (1st ed.). Mizan.
  34. Suyūṭī, J. (1974). Al-Itqān fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān (Vol. 1). al-Hay’ah al-Miṣrīyah al-‘Ammah li al-Kitāb.
  35. Watt, W. M. (1970). Bell’s Introduction to the Qur’an. Edinburg University Press.
  36. Zubaidi, S., Fattah, D. A., & Asnawi, A. R. (2023). Munāsabah Ayat Dalam Sūrah Al-Qalam Perspektif Semitic Rhetorical Analysis (SRA). Al Burhan Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur An, 23. https://journal.ptiq.ac.id/index.php/alburhan/article/view/53
  37. Zubaidi, S., & Muslih, M. (2020). Kritik Epistemologi dan Model Pembacaan Kontemporer.