Main Article Content

Abstract

In the contemporary era, the infiltration of non-authentic narratives has permeated the discourse of Qur’anic interpretation. This phenomenon poses significant challenges. This article addresses the issue of how the story of Harūt and Mārūt has been infiltrated by data sources and has the potential to distort the divine meaning, as well as how al-dakhil plays a role in the epistemology of da’wah. The main objective of this study is to analyse the dialectical relationship of al-dakhīl in the interpretation of Mafātīḥ Al-Ġaib, focusing on the impact of this fictional infiltration narrative on Islamic da’wah discourse. To achieve this, a qualitative method encompassing a comprehensive review of literature and interpretations related to the story of Harūt and Mārūt serves as the foundation of the research methodology. The results of this study indicate that the spread of infiltrative narratives without preventive measures can lead to the degradation of fundamental Islamic values. These findings underscore the need for a responsible approach in explaining Islamic teachings. In another dimension, this article advocates for the validation of sources and the promotion of accurate interpretations. Ultimately, this research contributes to the ongoing discourse in the world of Qur’anic interpretation by emphasizing the importance of preserving authentic Islamic teachings in an increasingly contemporary world.

Keywords

Al-Dakhīl Mafātīḥ Al-Ġaib Harūt and Mārūt

Article Details

How to Cite
Muhammad Agil Atoillah, Muhammad Luthfi Syarif, Abd. Kholid, & Muhammad Irham Saryulis. (2025). Dialectics of Al-Dakhīl and Analytical Study of the Story Hārūt and Mārūt in Tafsir Mafātīḥ Al-Ġaib. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 4(2), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v4i2.340

References

  1. ’Abd Fattāḥ al-’Awwāri. (2017). Fatḥ Khabīr fī Bayān al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr. Matba’ah Kulliyah Uṣūl al-Dīn Jāmi’ah al-Azhar.
  2. ’Abd Wahhab Fāyid. (1978). Al-Dakhīl fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Karīm (Vol 1). Maṭba’ah al-Ḥaḍarah al-’Arabiyyah.
  3. ’Albah, ’Abd al-Raḥīm Faris Abū. (1996). Al-Dakhīl fī Tafsīr fī al-Qarn al-Rābi’ al-’Asyr al-Hijr. Jāmi’ah al-Qur’an al-Karīm wa ’Ulūm Islāmiyah.
  4. Adawy, A. A., Salma, F. M., Kediri, I., & Kediri, I. (2025). Ad-Dakhîl in Tafsir Al-Kasyfu Wa Al-Bayân ’An Tafsîr Al-Qur ’ân (Analysis of the Story of Prophet Ayub). INCOILS: International Conference on Islam, Law, and Society, 4(1). https://incoils.or.id/index.php/INCOILS/article/view/230
  5. Afroni, S. (2018). Teknik Interpretasi Dalam Tafsir Al Qur’an Dan Potensi Deviasi Penerapannya Menurut Ilmu Dakhil. Al - Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 3(01), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.30868/at.v3i01.256
  6. Ahmad Sahal Aqil Abrori, M. R. (2024). Al-Dakhil Dalam Tafsir Ilmi. TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 5(2), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v21i2.262
  7. Alfirdaus, R. (2025). A Critical Analysis of Al-Dzahabi’s Critique on Al-Kasysyaf’s Interpretation of Q.S . an-Nisa’: 164. Jurnal Studi Qur’an, 21(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.21009/JSQ.21.2.4
  8. Ali, M., Budyastomo, A. W., & Harun. (2021). The Impact Of Social Media For The Development Of Da’wah In Indonesia. Religia: Jurnal Ilmi-Ilmu Keislaman, 24(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v24i1.2224
  9. Amelia, U., & Nasrulloh. (2024). Konsep Etika Komunikasi Bermedia Sosial Bagi Generasi Milenial Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 3(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v3i2.199
  10. Andini, A., Triastuty, N., & Sahputra, H. (2025). Kajian Kritis Al-Dakhil dari Jalur Teologi Mu ’ tazilah , Syi ’ ah dan Khawarij. Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial, dan PengabdianKepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 577–583. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v5i2.1270
  11. Azzalia, S. (2024). Riwayat Isrā’iliyyāt Dalam Kisah Hārūt Dan Mārūt: Telaah Kitab Mawārid al-Bayān fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān. Diya’ al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Qur’an dan al-Hadisr: Jurnal Studi al-Qur’an dan al-Hadis, 12(1), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v12i1.18053
  12. B. A. Simanjuntak & S. Sosrodihardjo. (2014). Metode Penelitian Sosial (Edisi Revisi) (Edisi I). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
  13. Fahd ’Abd Raḥmān Sulaimān al-Rūmī. (1983). Manhaj al-Madrasah al-’Aqliyyah al-Ḥadiṯsah fī al-Tafsīr (Cet 2). Mu’assasah al-Risālah.
  14. Fatih, M. (2022). Konsep Keserasian Al-Qur’an Dalam Tafsir Mafatihul Ghaib Karya Fakhruddin Ar-Razi: Perspektif Ilmu Munasabah. Progressa: Journal of Islamic Religious Instruction, 6(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.32616/pgr.v6.2.419.1-18
  15. Hajar, A., & Riyadi, A. K. (2023). Analisis Kesalah Pahaman Kisah Israiliyat dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Studia Quranika, 7(2), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.21111/studiquran.v7i2.8552
  16. Ḥāmid Aḥmad al-Ṭāhir al-Basyūnī. (2004). Al-Isrā’iliyyāt wa al-Mauḍū’āt wa Bida’ al-Tafāsīr Qadīman wa Ḥadīṯan (Cet 1). Dār al-Taqwa. http://www.al-maktabeh.com
  17. Hannan, A. (2022). Covid-19 dan Disrupsi Praktik Ritual Keagamaan Di Indonesia : Dari Tradisional Ke Virtual (Covid-19 And The Disruption Of Religious Practices In Indonesia : From Traditional To Virtual). Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 16(2), 263–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/jsr.v16i2.2378
  18. Himayah, D. M., Qomariyah, Khoiroh, M., & Lestari, A. P. W. (2024). Analysis Of Al-Aṣīl And Al-Dakhīl Interpretation of The Story of Prophet Solomon’s Trial QS. Ṣād In Tafsir Al-Ṭabarī. ZAD Al-Mufassirin, 6(2), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.55759/zam.v6i2.240
  19. Ḥusain al-Ẓahabī. (n.d.). Al-Isrāiliyyāt fī al-Tafsīr wa al-Ḥadiṯ. Maktabah Wahbah.
  20. Husna Maulida. (2025). Kajian Kitab Tafsir Mafatih Al-Ghaib Karya Fakhruddin Al Razi. At-Taklim : Jurnal Pendidikan Multidisiplin, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.71282/at-taklim.v2i1.48
  21. Husna, Z. Z. (2021). Perkembangan Dakwah Melalui Media Sosial Instagram. Ath Thariq Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 5(2), 197. https://doi.org/10.32332/ath_thariq.v5i2.3539
  22. Ibrāhim Khalīfah. (2007). Al-Dakhīl fī Tafsīr. Maṭba’ah Dār al-Kitāb.
  23. Jamāl Muṣṭafa ’Abd Ḥamid. (2007). Uṣūl al-Dakhīl fī al-Tafsīr Ay Tanzīl. Maṭba’ah Kuliyyah Uṣūl al-Dīn Jāmi’ah al-Azhar.
  24. Kahfi, S. (2024). Digitalisasi Dakwah Islam : Model Edukasi Berbasis Teknologi bagi Komunitas Muslim. 3(Tahun), 57–64.
  25. Maulana, I. I., Saefullah, C., & Sukayat, T. (2020). Dakwah di Media Sosial pada Channel Youtube Akhyar TV. Tabligh: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 3(3), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.15575/tabligh.v3i3.675
  26. Mubarok, A. R. (2024). Moderasi Beragama di Era Digital : Tantangan dan Peluang. 2, 1–11.
  27. Muhammad Faẖr al-Dīn al-Razī. (1981). Mafātīh al-Ġoib (Cet 1). Dār al-Fikr. https://archive.org/details/trazi29/trazi19
  28. Muhammad Taqwa, Irfhan, Hery Sahputra, A. H. (2025). Pengertian dan Perkembangan Al-Dakhil Fi Al-Tafsir. Jurnal Mudabbir: Journal Research and Education Studies, 5(2), 852–864. https://doi.org/10.56832/mudabbir.v5i2.1264
  29. Nur Farhana B, H. Ahmad, S. Abd Rahman, H. B. (2018). Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi: A Systematic Review on Literature Found in Indonesia. IJCIET: International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(5). https://doi.org/: IJCIET_09_05_078
  30. Rāġib Al-Aṣfahānī. (n.d.). Al-Mufradāt Fī Ġarīb Al-Qur’ān, Rāġib Al-Aṣfahānī, Maktabah Nazār Muṣṭafa Al-Bāz. Maktabah Al-Bāz.
  31. Razi, F. (2024). Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Konsep Al-Ashil Dan Al-Dakhil. JIQTA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 3(2), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.36769/jiqta.v3i2.483
  32. Retno Prayudi. (2023). Penerapan Metode Al-Dakhil dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an (Edisi 1). Haura Utama.
  33. Ride, A. R., & Riyadi, A. K. (2022). Al-Dakhil dalam Tafsir Ilmi (Kajian Kritik Husein Al-Dhazabi Atas Kitab Al-Jawahir Fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an). Tajdid, 21(2), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v21i2.262
  34. Rohman, A., Abdul Rahman, & Amin. (2023). Ragam Komunikasi Dakwah bi Al-Lisan dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 2(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v2i2.89
  35. Saputra, R. (2024). Meninjau Dakhil dalam Kitab Tafsir al-Durru al-Mantsur fi Tafsir al-Ma’tsur Surah Shad. Jalsah: The Journal of al-qur’an and as-Sunnah Studies, 4(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37252/jqs.v4i1.786
  36. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D (Cet 25). Alfabeta.
  37. Syahbah, M. A. (1988). Al-Isrāliyyāt wa Al-Mauḍū’āt fī Kutub al-Tafsīr (Cet 4). Maktabah al-Sunnah.
  38. Ulfa, M. (2024). Transformasi Komunikasi Dakwah dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Praktik Keagamaan Masyarakat Muslim di Indonesia. NAHNU: Journal of Nahdlatul Ulama and Contemporary Islamic Studies, 2(2), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.63875/nahnu.v2i2.58
  39. Ulinnuha, M. (2017). Konsep al-Ashîl dan al-Dakhîl dalam Tafsir Alquran. Madania, 21(2), 127–144. http://repository.iiq.ac.id//handle/123456789/1718
  40. W.Dozan, M. (2024). Penerapan Metode dan Pendekatan Tafsr di Era Digital: Menimbang Urgensi Tafsir di era Digital. El-Umdah: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al- Qur’an, 7(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.20414/elumdah.v7i2.12588
  41. Wahyuni, R., & Harahap, R. (2023). Efektivitas Media Sosial Sebagai Media Dakwah Pada Era Digital : Study Literature Review. An-Nadwah, 29(2), 172. http://dx.doi.org/10.37064/consilium.v10i2.20340