Main Article Content

Abstract

Water in the Qur’an occupies a very important position, not only as a physical element but also as having sacred spiritual and theological dimensions. Amid the global ecological crisis and advances in reproductive bioethics, the meaning of water is often reduced to a mere economic commodity or a passive biological object. This study aims to deconstruct the shift in the meaning of al-mā’ in QS. Al-Anbiyā’ [21]: 30 using Roland Barthes’ semiotics to reveal the layers of meaning contained within literal, symbolic, and ideological that are relevant to the contemporary context. The method used in this research is qualitative-hermeneutic, focusing on Roland Barthes’ semiotic analysis technique which is capable of dissecting the text into three layers: denotation, connotation, and myth. The results show that at the denotation level, al-mā’ signifies water as a vital element of life and sperm as the biological origin of humans. At the connotation level, water transforms into a symbol of God’s grace, a sign of cosmic origins, spiritual purity, and the continuity of generations. At the myth level, al-mā’ represents the ideology of biological sustainability, ecology, and “green theology”. It also represents the responsibility of humans as khalifah (stewards) to protect a divine trust. Furthermore, the Qur’an offers a “counter-myth” against a modernity that deadens water and exploits nature. Water is a theological mandate, not merely a limitless commodity to be freely exploited. This research provides a significant contribution by asserting that water conservation is a tawhid (monotheistic) obligation rather than just an ethical choice.

Keywords

Meaning of Al-Mā’ Roland Barthes Semiotics QS. Al-Anbiyā’ [21]: 30

Article Details

How to Cite
Hakim, L. (2026). Roland Barthes’ Semiotic Analysis of the Meaning of Al-Mā’ in QS. Al- Anbiyā’ [21]: 30. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 5(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v5i1.727

References

  1. ‘Asyur, M. T. I. (1984). al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. In al Dar al Tunisiyah.
  2. Adiansyah, R., Sofia, A., Bensar, M., Adams, A., & Barakat, M. A. (2023). Roland Barthes Semiotic Study: Understanding the Meaning Word of ‘Azab, a Reinterpretation for Modern Society. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 2(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v2i3.1445
  3. Afifah, F. (2022). Air Menurut Konsep Al–Quran Dan Sains Medika. 4, Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains (Kiiis) Edisi 4. 163–169. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/saintek/kiiis
  4. Alvin, M. (2024). Manfaat Ekologis Air Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an dan Sains Pada Sebuah Studi Tafsir Ekologi. Al Kareem Jurnal Ilmu Al Qur’an dan Tafsir, 2(2), 52–68. https://jurnal.alhikmah.ac.id/index.php/alkareem
  5. Amin, M. H. I. (2024a). Nahl Sebagai Simbol: Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes terhadap QS. An-Nahl Ayat 68-69. Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam, 5(3), 689–705. https://doi.org/10.58401/takwiluna.v5i3.1776
  6. Amin, M. H. I. (2024b). Nahl Sebagai Simbol: Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes Terhadap QS. An-Nahl Ayat 68-69. Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam, 5(3), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.58401/takwiluna.v5i3.1776
  7. Amirudin, M. S., Ismail, H., & Nur, A. (2023). Orientasi Tafsir Sains: Analisis Ayat-Ayat tentang Air dalam al-Qur’an. Studia Quranika, 8(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.21111/studiquran.v8i1.9438
  8. Ashraf, M. (2015). Importance of Water in the Light of Quran and Sunnah and Ways of its Saving. Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources (PCRWR) Islamabad, 1–37.
  9. Asrori, M., Muhammad, M., Yaqin, M. Z. N., Firyal, W., & Wahidah, F. (2025). Water Conservation in the Qur’anic Perspective: A Thematic Analysis of Ethical Water Usage in Purification Rituals. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae, 23(3), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5854
  10. Aulia, Y. V. (2022). Makna Abaqa Nabi Yusuf Dalam Al-Qur’an (Aplikasi Semiotika Roland Barthes Terhadap QS. As-Saffat: 140). Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Quran dan Tafsir, 2(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.19109/jsq.v2i1.11445
  11. Baqi, M. F. ‘Abdul. (1981). Mu’jam al-Mufahras Li al-Faz al-Qurani al-Karim. Darul Fikr : Beirut.
  12. Barthes, R. (1972). Mytologies. 163.
  13. Catovic, S. (2012). Islamic Sacred Texts Related to Water. 1–5. https://www.faithinwater.org
  14. Chaer, H., Sirulhaq, A., Rasyad, A., & Malik, D. A. (2023). Biosemiotics of Water in the Quran Surah Al-Anbiya’ Verse 30. Mozaik Humaniora, 23(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.20473/mozaik.v23i1.37527
  15. Dayu, B. S. A., & Syadli, M. R. (2023). Memahami Konsep Semiotika Ferdinand De Saussure dalam Komunikasi. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 01, 152–164. https://doi.org/10.30999/lantera.v1i2.2774
  16. Efendi, E., Siregar, I. M., & Harahap, R. R. (2023). Semiotika Tanda dan Makna. Da’watuna: Journal of Communication and Islamic Broadcasting, 4(1), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.47467/dawatuna.v4i1.3329
  17. Fadhliyah, Z. (2021). Semiotika Ferdinand de Saussure sebagai Metode Penafsiran al-Qur’an: Kajian Teoritis. Al-Afkar, 4(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v4i1.166
  18. Haddade, H. (2016). Air Prespektif Al-Qur’an dan Sains. Jurnal Alauddin Makassar, 4, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v16i2.924
  19. Imamudin, M. (2012). Peranan Air Dala Perspektif Al- Qur’an (Air Sebagai Sumber Kehidupan). El-Hayah, 3(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.18860/elha.v3i1.2220
  20. Katsir, I. (2005). Tafsir al-Qur’an al-’Adzim. Al-Maktabah al- Islamiyah.
  21. Khikmatiar, A. (2019). Konsep Poligami Dalam Al-Qur’an. Qof, 3(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v3i1.903
  22. Malia, H., & Atmi, S. N. (2023). Analisis Makna Hurun ‘in Dalam Al-Qur’an (Kajian Teori Semiotika Roland Barthes). In Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Qur’an dan al-Hadits (Vol. 17, Nomor 2, hal. 163). https://doi.org/10.24042/002023171556700
  23. Manzhur, I. (1968). Lisn Al ‘Arab (hal. 1386).
  24. Moh. Arif Rakman Hakim. (2024). Konotasi Makna Libās dalam Pernikahan: Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes Dalam Q.S al-Baqarah [2]:187). Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 3(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.14421/jkii.v9i1.1372
  25. Mulyazir, & Fadhillah, M. (2023). Konsep Semiotika Roland Barthes dan Aplikasinya terhadap Kajian Al-Quran. Al-Fathanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Pendidikan Agama Islam Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh, 3(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.37598/al-fathanah.v3i1,%20April.1809
  26. Musarofah, S. (2021). Ketersediaan Air Bagi Kehidupan: Studi Terhadap Asal-Usul dan Hilangnya Air di Bumi Perspektif Al-Quran dan Sains. Ngabari: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial, 14(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.51772/njsis.v14i1.68
  27. Nasr, S. H. (1969). The Encounter of Man and Nature. The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man. Die Welt des Islams, 12(4), 246. https://doi.org/10.2307/1569702
  28. Pramaskara, T. E. (2022). Analisis Semiotika Peirce pada Sampul Majalah Tempo Edisi Jokowi Beserta Bayangan Pinokio. Jurnal Kajian Jurnalisme, 5(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkj.v5i2.36251
  29. Prasetya, L. T. (2022). Representasi Kelas Sosial Dalam Film Gundala (Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes). Jurnal Audiens, 3(3), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.18196/jas.v3i3.12697
  30. Qurṭubī, M. ibn A. (1933). al-Jāmiʻ li-aḥkām al-Qur’ān, Volume 19. Maṭbaʻat Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣrīyah.
  31. Rohman, A. (2021). Konsep “Pluralisme Agama” Dalam Al-Quran (Aplikasi Semiotika Roland Barthes Terhadap Qs. AlBaqarah [2]: 62). Bayani: Jurnal Studi Islam, 1(2), 190–209. https://doi.org/10.52496/bayaniV.1I.2pp190-209
  32. Rohmaniah, A. F. (2021). Kajian Semiotika Roland Barthes. Al-Ittishol: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, 2(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.51339/ittishol.v2i2.308
  33. Sakinah, E. H. (2023). Bullying Dalam Al-Qur’an (Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes Terhadap Qs. Al-Hujurat (49): 11). At-Tahfidz: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 5(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.53649/at-tahfidz.v5i1.367
  34. Sawaluddin, & Sainab. (2018). Air Dalam Persefektif Al-Qur’an dan Sains. ELT Journal, 07(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab033
  35. Shihab, M. Q. (1996). Wawasan Al - Qur’an Tafsir. In Bandung (Vol. 4, Nomor 1, hal. 1–11). Mizan Pustaka.
  36. Shihab, M. Q. (2005). Dia Dimana Mana (hal. xi). Lentera Hati Group.
  37. Wardani. (2021). Tafsir Ilmiah (Al-Tafsīr Al-‘Ilmī) Al-Qur`an Sebagai Integrasi Ilmu: Konseptualisasi Metode Penafsiran dan Penerapannya di Universitas Islam Negeri di Indonesia. Zahir Publishing.
  38. Wijaya, R. (2021). Makna Syifa dalam Al-Qur’an (Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes pada QS al-Isra 82). Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan, 16(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v16i2.924
  39. Zakariyyā, A. al-H. A. bin F. bin. (1979). Mu_jam_maqayis_al_lughah. Dār al-Fikr, Beirut.