Main Article Content

Abstract

The problem of speaking Arabic (ESA) is often an important issue in teaching Arabic to students. The situational language teaching (SLT) approach is seen as being able to be a solution to this problem. This study aims to analyze the approach of SLT to improve the ESA skills of primary school students. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method at Daarul Ukhuwwah Qur’an Basic School, Malang. The research sample is 45 students and 3 teachers. Data was collected through observation, interview, and document study. Then analyzed using the theory of Miles and Huberman. The results of the study show that the SLT approach makes students involved in communicative situations that are similar to their daily lives, but in a more formal context and in accordance with ESA. Teachers can arrange situations that demand the use of formal Arabic, such as class discussions, presentations, or role-plays involving situations in school or other formal environments. The SLT approach is also a solution for improving the Arabic language skills of primary school students starting with istima’, kalam, qira’ah, and kitabah in the context of real situations in everyday life.

Keywords

Educated Spoken Arabic Arabic as a Foreign Language Situational Language

Article Details

How to Cite
Ritonga, A. W., Abdullah, M. Y., & Handika Ahmad Nur Prasetyo. (2025). The Role of Arabic Situational Teaching for Spoken Arabic Proficiency: Case Study of Elementary School Students in Malang. Indonesian Journal of Arabic Education and Learning, 1(1), 56–65. Retrieved from https://jurnal.stiq.assyifa.ac.id/ijael/article/view/586

References

  1. Abdelhadi, R., Hameed, L., Khaled, F., & Anderson, J. (2020). Creative interactions with art works: An engaging approach to Arabic language-and-culture learning. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1579219
  2. Adil, M. (2020). Exploring the Role of Translation in Communicative Language Teaching or the Communicative Approach. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2158244020924403. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020924403
  3. Aprianto, D., & Zaini, N. (2019). The Principles of Language Learning and Teaching in Communication Skill Developments. Voices of English Language Education Society, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v3i1.1281
  4. Du, J. (2017). On the Application of Situational Language Teaching Method to Mongolian English Majors. English Language and Literature Studies, 7(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v7n4p98
  5. Gao, Y., Kassymova, R. T., & Luo, Y. (2022). Application of virtual simulation situational model in Russian spatial preposition teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985887
  6. Huang, A. F. M., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2010). Situational Language Teaching in Ubiquitous Learning Environments. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 2(3), Article 3.
  7. Hussain, S., & Sajid, S. (2015). Oral Approach and Situational Language Teaching: A Short Review. Paripex - Indian Journal Of Research, 4(6), 197–199.
  8. Karkouti, I. M., DeVere Wolsey, T., Bekele, T. A., & Toprak, M. (2021). Empowering teachers during refugee crises: Social support they need to Thrive. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, 103471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103471
  9. Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
  10. Liu, L., & Yang, H. (2023). The Application of Situational Teaching Method in the Cultivation of Intercultural Communicative Competence. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i1.12758
  11. Luqyana, N., Inayah, N., & Burhansyah, B. (2023). The effectiveness of using situational language teaching in teaching speaking skills for junior high school. Research in English and Education Journal, 8(4), 181–197.
  12. Masna, Y., Dahliana, S., & Martaputri, N. A. (2020). Exploring English Teachers’ Perceptions On Using Situational Language Teaching Method In Teaching Vocabulary. Getsempena English Education Journal, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v7i2.1192
  13. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
  14. Mitchell, T. F. (1986). What is educated spoken Arabic? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1986(61), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1986.61.7
  15. Mustofa, S., Desrani, A., & Ritonga, A. W. (2022). HOTS in Arabic Learning: A Study of The Implementation of HOTS on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Al-Ta’rib : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab IAIN Palangka Raya, 10(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.23971/altarib.v10i2.4088
  16. Nirwansyah. (2021). Educated Spoken Arabic (ESA) in the Teaching of Arabic in Indonesia. 103–107. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210407.221
  17. Promadi. (2016). Educated Spoken Arabic (ESA): A New Alternative For Future Teaching Arabic as a Foreign Language. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(1), 26–32.
  18. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305
  19. Ritonga, A. W., Bahruddin, U., Abdullah, M. Y., Desrani, A., & Ayad, N. (2025). Scientometrics of Language Policy in Sustaining Arabic Learning in Indonesia. Lisanan Arabiya: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 9(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.32699/liar.v9vi1.8954
  20. Ritonga, A. W., Desrani, A., & Ritonga, H. (2025). Maximizing the Arabic Language Curriculum to Produce Graduate Qualifications at Integrated Islamic School. El-Jaudah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 6(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.56874/ej.v6i1.2341
  21. Smith, M., & Loewen, S. (2018). Situational Language Teaching. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0174
  22. Ulum, M. S., Rohmana, W. I. M., & Elvira, M. (2023). Dynamics of Content Knowledge: Learned from Indonesian Arabic Teachers. Education Research International, 2023(1), 8883362. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8883362
  23. Uskov, V. L., Bakken, J. P., Aluri, L., Rayala, N., Uskova, M., Sharma, K., & Rachakonda, R. (2019). Learning Analytics Based Smart Pedagogy: Student Feedback. In V. L. Uskov, R. J. Howlett, L. C. Jain, & L. Vlacic (Eds.), Smart Education and e-Learning 2018 (pp. 117–131). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92363-5_11
  24. Widyawulandari, R., Sarwanto, & Indriayu, M. (2019). Implementation of Joyful Learning Approach in Providing Learning Motivation for Elementary School Student. 54–58. https://doi.org/10.2991/steach-18.2019.12