Main Article Content

Abstract

Developments in contemporary hadith studies have given rise to various new approaches to examining the authenticity of hadith, one of which is the isnad cum matan method developed by Harald Motzki. This method offers an integrated analysis of the sanad and matan in an effort to reconstruct the history of hadith transmission more comprehensively. This study aims to analyze the basic concepts of Harald Motzki’s isnad cum matan method and to examine its relevance in the study of hadith authenticity. The research employs a qualitative method using a literature review approach. Data were obtained from the works of Harald Motzki, literature on classical and contemporary hadith studies, and various scholarly articles discussing the isnad cum matan method. Data analysis was conducted using a descriptive-analytical approach by examining the methodological framework, application, and contribution of this method to modern hadith criticism. The results indicate that the isnad cum matan method integrates the analysis of isnad and matan, thereby providing a more systematic historical reconstruction of the hadith transmission process compared to approaches that focus solely on isnad or matan separately. This method also enriches the study of hadith authenticity by offering a historical-critical perspective without neglecting the fundamental principles of hadith science. However, its application requires adequate narrative data and in-depth comparative analysis; therefore, not all hadiths.

Keywords

Harald Motzki Isnad Cum Matan Authenticity of Hadith Criticism of Hadith

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurhidayanti, & Auliana, N. H. (2026). Harald Motzki’s Isnad Cum Matan Method in the Study of Hadith Authenticity: An Analysis of the Concept and Its Relevance. Al-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Mahasiswa Pendidikan, 2(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.58363/alafkar.v2i2.1396

References

  1. Amin, K. (2009). Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis.
  2. Anam, K., & Hanafi, Y. (2026). Tracing the Authenticity of the Early Islamic Law: A Critical Review of the Isnad Cum Matn Methodology in The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence By Harald Motzki. Al-Mudabbir: Journal of Islamic Education Management,2(1),232–236. https://albaayaninstitute.org/index.php/almudabbir/article/view/333
  3. Baihaqqi, M. I., & Kholis, N. (2024). Metode Otentisitas Hadis Perspektif Harald Motzki dan Responnya Atas Skeptisisme Orientalis Terhadap Hadis. AL-AFKAR: Journal for Islamic Studies, 7(4), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v7i4.1273.Harald
  4. Bargot, B. (2024). Pemikiran Juynboll Dalam Kajian Hadis. Al-Thiqah: Journal of Hadith and Prophetic Tradition, 4(2), 42–50. http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/Al-Thiqah/article/view/23092
  5. Fadhil, H. M., & Imtyas, R. (2023). The Implementation Theory of Isnād Cum Matn Harald Motzki: A Hadith Study on Loving Arabs. Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15408/ushuluna.v9i1.30828
  6. Haitomi, F., & Syachrofi, M. (2020). Aplikasi Teori Isnad Cum Matn Harald Motzki Dalam Hadis Misoginis Penciptaan Perempuan. Al-Bukhari Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 3(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i1.1432
  7. Jannah, S. (2020). Kritik Harald Motzki Terhadap Teori Isnad Hais Joseph Schacht. Riwayah : Jurnal Studi Hadis, 6(2), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.21043/riwayah.v6i2.8086
  8. Junus, I. J., Wahyudin, D. M., Masrur, A., Najib, M., & Nur, S. (2025). Deconstruction of the Common Link Theory : Harald Motzki ’ s Methodological Critique of G . H . A . Juynboll ’ s Skepticism in Hadith Dating. DIROYAH Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 10(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v10i1.47688
  9. Masrur, A. (2007). Teori Common Link GHA Juynboll, Melacak Akar Kesejarahan Hadits Nabi. LKiS Yogyakarta.
  10. Motzki, H. (2005). Dating Muslim Traditions: A Survey. Arabica, 52(2), 204–253. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4057795
  11. Mufid, A. (2017). Dating Hadits Tentang Persaksian Melihat Hilal: Telaah atas Isnad Cum Matn Analysis Harald Motzki. Millato Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 2(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.18326/millati.v2i1.85-102
  12. Muhsin, M. (2017). Studi Kritik Matan Hadis. Penerbit A-Empat.
  13. Mutammimah, B., & Hosni, M. (2023). Hadith Authentication Method: Concept, Application and Critique of Orientalist Skepticism. RELIGIA Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 26(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v26i1.863
  14. Rasyidaturrabi’ah, R. (2016). Hadis Tentang Nikah Mut’ah (Studi Aplikatif Isnad Cum Matn). UIN Sunan Kalijaga. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/19857/
  15. Riady, F. (2021). Nama- Nama Alternatif Dalam Isnād Menurut Joseph Schact. Mashdar Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 3(2), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.15548/mashdar.v3i2.2938
  16. Ridlo, M. A. (2024). Dramaturgi Sejarah Wacana Studi Hadis Orientalis. El-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis Dan Integrasi Ilmu, 5(2), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.19109/elsunnah.v5i2.24849
  17. Ridwan, R. (2026). Harald Motzki’s Thought in Hadith Studies: An Analysis of the Authenticity of the Ṣ a ḥīfah of ʿAbd al - Razzāq Pemikiran Harald Motzki dalam Kajian Hadis: Analisis terhadap Otentisitas Ṣ a ḥīfah ʿAbd al - Razzāq. 17(01), 2655–2663. http://dx.doi.org/10.58836/jpma.v17i1.29308
  18. Setiadi, Y. (2019). Kontribusi Arent Jan Wensinck dalam Ilmu Takhrīj Hadis. Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies, 8(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v8i2.13395
  19. Sumbulah, U. (2010). Kajian kritis ilmu hadis. UIN-Maliki Press.
  20. Umi Sumbulah, dkk (2022). Isnad Cum Matan Analysis Sebagai Metode Otentifikasi Hadis Nabi. Jurnal Studi Islam Nusantara, 4(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.24235/jshn.v4i2.12990
  21. Voort, N. B. der. (2021). Untangling the “Unwritten Documents” of the Prophet Muh .ammad. AnIsn¯ad-cum-Matn Analysis of Interwoven Traditions. Religions, 12(8), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12080579
  22. Wijayanti, S., & Sukmawati, S. (2024). Implementasi Teori Isnad Cum Matan dalam Hadis Seseorang yang Mempercepat Salat Karena Mendengar Tangisan Bayi. Islamic Insights Journal,6(2),1–14. https://doi.org/10.59971/ub.iij.2024.006.02.1