Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (English)
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aims of this research is to find out how the dynamics of Arabic language learning have developed over a period of ten years (2013-2023) by analyzing study topics, authors, published journals, and countries that produce scientific works on Arabic language learning. Through this research, it can be seen that the development of Arabic language learning and teaching studies in the last ten years has been very dynamic with the discovery of developments in topics, authors, published journals, and countries that have produced scientific works regarding Arabic language learning in that decade. Furthermore, the research method used is a qualitative method with a Bibliometric approach. Research data was taken from Scopus metadata and then analyzed with the employment of the VosViewer and Biblishiny applications as data analysis software. By combining these two applications, it is hoped that two softwares can illustrate the development of Arabic language learning well.

Keywords

Bibliometric Tracing Dynamics Decade Arabic Language Teaching and Learning

Article Details

How to Cite
Ritonga, A. W., & Abdullah, M. Y. (2025). Tracing Dynamics of Arabic Language Teaching and Learning Studies: Trends from a Bibliometric-Content Analysis. Al-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Mahasiswa, 1(1), 21–40. Retrieved from https://jurnal.stiq.assyifa.ac.id/alafkar/article/view/607
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdullah, M. Y., Al-Labib, W. H., & Minalia, D. (2023). Arabic Language Learning and Teaching Trends A Bibliometric Analysis With Biblioshiny R. International Education Conference (IEC) FITK, 2(1), Article 1.
  2. Al Husaeni, D. F., & Nandiyanto, A. (2021). Bibliometric Using Vosviewer with Publish or Perish (using Google Scholar data): From Step-by-step Processing for Users to the Practical Examples in the Analysis of Digital Learning Articles in Pre and Post Covid-19 Pandemic. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 2, 19–46. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v2i1.37368
  3. Assalahi, H. M. (2013). Why Is the Grammar-translation Method Still Alive in the Arab World? Teachers’ Beliefs and Its implications for EFL Teacher Education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.4.589-599
  4. Azevedo, S. G., Santos, M., & Antón, J. R. (2019). Supply chain of renewable energy: A bibliometric review approach. Biomass and Bioenergy, 126, 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.022
  5. Bakker, B. (2020). Learning Arabic Vocabulary: The Effectiveness of Teaching Vocabulary and Vocabulary Learning Strategies. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 20(10), 190–202.
  6. Benseng, A., & Tam, S. (2024). Mapping the Evolution of Arabic Language Research: A Bibliometric Approach. Mesopotamian Journal of Arabic Language Studies, 2024, Article 2024. https://doi.org/10.58496/MJALS/2024/001
  7. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics.” Scientometrics, 12(5), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
  8. Daud, W. A. A. W., Teck, W. K., Ghani, M. T. A., & Ramli, S. (2020). M-Learning Boost Students’ Motivation in Learning Arabic Language Proficiency for Elementary Level. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4384–4392. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081004
  9. Din, A. G. B. M., Din, O. bin M., Awae, F., Ajmain@Jima’ain, M. T., abuHassna, H., & Taher, R. (2023). Arabic Language and Communication: Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(1), 642–654.
  10. Facchin, A. (Ed.). (2019). The Historical Background. In Teaching Arabic as a Foreign Language: Origins, Developments and Current Directions (pp. 25–46). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048542901.003
  11. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
  12. Farisha, F., Fahri, M., & Al-Ghifari, R. A. (2023). Analysis Of Research Trends In Arabic Language Education Using A Bibliometric Approach In Indonesian National Journals Lughawiyah: Journal of Arabic Education and Linguistics, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31958/lughawiyah.v5i2.10384
  13. Kristia, K., Kovács, S., Bács, Z., & Rabbi, M. F. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Food Consumption: Historical Evolution, Dominant Topics and Trends. Sustainability, 15(11), 8998. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118998
  14. Mubarak, F., Deviana, A. D., Hasanah, M., Qomariyah, L., Nasarudine, Hafiz, A., Marsiah, & Yahya, M. (2022). Arabic Phrases Errors in Writing Theses for Masters Students at Indonesian Universities. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 201–211.
  15. Musthofa, T. (2022). CEFR-Based Policy in Arabic Language Teaching and Cultural Dimension in Indonesian Islamic Higher Education. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 96–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911545
  16. Ninkov, A., Frank, J., & Maggio, L. (2021). Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4
  17. Qobti, A., & Almohaimeed, S. (2024). Translation Research in the Arabic Language: A Bibliometric Study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7(5), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.5.10
  18. Ritonga, M., Hakim, R., Nurdianto, T., & Ritonga, A. W. (2023). Learning for early childhood using the IcanDO platform: Breakthroughs for golden age education in Arabic learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11575-7
  19. Şen Yaman, G. (2022). An examination of the studies on Arabic Language Teaching (ALT): A bibliometric mapping analysis. International Journal of Teaching & Education, 1727–1740.
  20. Shen, C., & Ho, J. (2020). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis with latent semantic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177
  21. Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
  22. Siregar, S. D. P., Sopian, A., & Naser, A. Do. M. (2023). The Research Trends in Grammatical Arabic in the Arabic Language. Nady Al-Adab, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.20956/jna.v20i2.26987
  23. Thoyib, F. M., Apriantoro, M. S., Maksum, M. N. R., & Jinan, M. (2023). Mapping the Evolution of Arabic Language Education Research through Bibliometric Analysis in the Scopus Database (1980-2023). Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity), 379–388.
  24. Versteegh, K. (2006). History of Arabic Language Teaching. In Handbook for Arabic Language Teaching Professionals in the 21st Century. Routledge.
  25. Wang, R., Lewis, M., Zheng-Pywell, R., Julson, J., Smithson, M., & Chen, H. (2022). Using the H-index as A Factor in the Promotion of Surgical Faculty. Heliyon, 8(4), e09319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09319
  26. Yunita, Y., Baroroh, R. U. B., Utami, S., Riswan, Y., & Saraswati, I. F. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis of Arabic Proficiency based on Scopus-Indexed Articles. Izdihar : Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v7i1.32220
  27. Zakaria R, A, A., Ah, A., & Z, O. (2021). Worldwide melatonin research: A bibliometric analysis of the published literature between 2015 and 2019. Chronobiology International, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2020.1838534